Verse 1
This verse refers to the Israelites losing the “stay and the staff, the whole stay of bread and the whole stay of water.” I believe this refers to items that were originally in Solomon’s temple. The bread had reference to the Queen of Heaven, and under King Josiah’s reforms these were removed, along with belief in a female deity. According to Margaret Barker,
The Enochic Apocalypse of Weeks, which summarizes the history of Israel without mentioning the Exodus and so is free of any Moses/Aaron/Deuteronomy influences, describes thus the changes in the time of Josiah, when the refugees in Egypt claimed that the Queen had been abandoned: ‘In the sixth week all who live in [the temple] shall become blind and the hearts of all of them shall godlessly forsake Wisdom.’ Wisdom’s first gift had been the vision which was eternal life, and this loss of vision was remembered as the significant change at the end of the first temple period. Wisdom was forsaken and vision was lost. Wisdom and her house is another recurring theme with the Bread of the Presence. This suggests it was an element in the cult [religion] of the first temple, where Melchizedek had been high priest, and Wisdom the Queen of Heaven, the patroness of Jerusalem. … The offerings to the Queen had been ‘cakes’… [used] to portray or depict her. (Barker, The Great High Priest, 91)
The bread and water also become sacramental. Again from Barker,
It has long been recognized that the Fourth Gospel [Gospel according to John] presents Jesus as Wisdom…. Thus, in the Fourth Gospel, when Jesus offers himself as the bread from heaven, in contrast to the manna which was the heavenly bread offered by Moses; this should be understood as a return to the heavenly bread by which Wisdom offered herself to her devotees and gave them eternal life. Cyril of Alexandria… said that manna was the shadow of the bread to come, the bread of angels which was spiritual and of Wisdom. This bread gave life…. Although the Bread of the Presence was food for the priests, when David took it to feed his men (1 Sam. 21:6), he pre-figured its being given to others too. (Barker, The Great High Priest, 93)
In both cases, consuming the bread and water are symbolic of consuming, or unifying, with God. God’s presence, power, and glory come into us to feed us, nourish us, and sustain life. According to Isaiah, the Israelites are rejecting this unity with God. Without this unity, they lose God’s influence, lose wisdom, and become subject to oppressors.
Verses 2-26
These verses describe what will become of Israel (and those in the last days), who reject the Lord and His covenant.
-vs. 6-7: This is totally my interpretation, but these verses may make reference to people lamenting the loss of the true covenant. The Hebrew of “I will not be an healer” could be translated as “I will not be a binder up,” with binding having covenant connotations. Essentially, Israel will have lost the power and authority to make binding covenants. Jesus Christ restored this power to his apostles (Matt. 16:19, D&C 124:93).
-v. 9: “The shew of their countenance doth witness against them.” Compare this to Alma 5:14. Speaking of countenances and the Book of Mormon, there’s an interesting ancient Mayan tradition where priests would wear the mask of a given god, thereby assuming the power of that god (if I understand correctly). Thus, when Alma asked whether you have “received His image in your countenance,” he may have been asking it in this context, essentially asking whether we had received the power of Christ within us.
-v. 10: For the most part, Isaiah uses an ancient form of Hebrew poetry called chiasmus. In this form, each poem is a reflection of itself, so it follows the pattern ABDCECDBA, with the mirror image being a bit different from the original, but making the same point. Both “ends” of the poem point to the center, which is generally Isaiah’s main point. In this chapter, that comes at verse 10, and underscores that things will be well with the righteous. Who are the righteous? Isaiah defines them as those who will “eat the fruit.” This could be pointing back to those who partake of the fruit of the tree of life, truly unifying with God, and keeping the first great commandment. These are not just people who are generally civil to others or who avoid outwardly sins. There’s something more to it. One must love God and unify with Him completely.
-v. 12: I am not settled on this yet, but I think that when it refers to “women rule over them,” it may be referring to the Israelites choosing the harlot over Wisdom. I’ll explain more in a future post. The point is, when we follow the wrong leaders, we lose the path to eternal life.
-v. 13: The Lord is always merciful! He pleads with us to follow Him! He is our advocate.
-v. 14: Ultimately, the Lord will be our judge, along with ancients. The “ancients” probably refers to those who practiced the original covenant and priesthood: think Adam, Noah, Enoch, Melchizedek. Why would they be judges? Because they were the original keepers of the vineyard that Isaiah references here. That “vineyard” included the tree of life and the true temple, but the Israelites (and others) have “eaten” (“burned” is probably a better reading here) the vineyard.
-v. 16-23: I’ve heard it suggested that “daughters of Zion” can refer to anyone who is part of the covenant, both male and female, so this may not strictly refer to women. Taken broadly, it shows that the covenant people have rejected the Lord and his Wisdom, and chosen instead materialism and worldly status (the harlot). Are we guilty of materialism? Do we derive our status and value from worldly accolades? Do we make an effort to keep up with Joneses?
-v. 24-26: Choosing the world over the Lord will have consequences. Isaiah describes it as a stink, burning, and a rent. This seems analogous to the great and spacious building. The end result is war, desolation, and societal instability – kind of describes the world we live in today. That would seem to indicate which choice we have made.
No comments:
Post a Comment